Skip to main content

High targeted migration of human mesenchymal stem cells grown in hypoxia is associated with enhanced activation of RhoA

Abstract

Introduction

A feature which makes stem cells promising candidates for cell therapy is their ability to migrate effectively into damaged or diseased tissues. Recent reports demonstrated the increased motility of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) grown under hypoxic conditions compared to normoxic cells. However, the directional migration of hMSC cultured in hypoxia has not been investigated. In this study we examined the in vitro transmembrane migration of hMSC permanently cultured in hypoxia in response to various cytokines. We also studied the involvement of RhoA, a molecule believed to play an essential role in the migration of MSC via reorganization of the cytoskeleton.

Methods

We compared the directional migration of human hMSCs grown permanently under normal (21%, normoxic) and low O2 (5%, hypoxic) conditions until passage 4 using an in vitro transmembrane migration assay. A series of 17 cytokines was used to induce chemotaxis. We also compared the level of GTP-bound RhoA in the cell extracts of calpeptin-activated hypoxic and normoxic hMSC.

Results

We found that hMSC cultured in hypoxia demonstrate markedly higher targeted migration activity compared to normoxic cells, particularly towards wound healing cytokines, including those found in ischemic and myocardial infarction. We also demonstrated for the first time that hMSC are dramatically more sensitive to activation of RhoA.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that high directional migration of hMSCs permanently grown in hypoxia is associated with the enhanced activation of RhoA. The enhanced migratory capacity of hypoxic hMSC would further suggest their potential advantages for clinical applications.

Introduction

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) or multipotent stromal cells are non-hematopoietic progenitor cells with potential to differentiate into multiple lineages - adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic. They are known to possess many features which make them an attractive candidate for stem cell therapy or drug delivery applications. Specifically, it has been established that MSC are capable of self-renewal [1], secreting a wide spectrum of cytokines and factors [2], and also have a unique ability to fuse with damaged cells [3–5]. Furthermore, some data indicate that MSC are able to migrate in vivo to the site of injury [6–8].

It is important to preserve these characteristics during tissue culture expansion, a necessary step towards the generation of clinically significant cell numbers. One of the major complications at this step is spontaneous cell differentiation, which can occur particularly in the presence of bovine serum. A possible approach to alleviate this problem is cultivation of MSC in a low oxygen environment. The underlying premise is that in vivo MSC reside in an environment with a relatively low oxygen (O2) concentration [9–11], which makes hypoxic tissue culture conditions beneficial. In particular, it has been shown that hypoxic MSC maintain significantly higher colony-forming unit capabilities and higher levels of stem cell-related genes [12]. They exhibit higher levels of osteoblastic and adipocytic differentiation markers (upon induction of the cells) as well as increased total protein levels compared to MSC cultured under 20% O2 (normoxic) conditions [13]. Several reports indicated that MSC cultured in hypoxia, demonstrate increased proliferation activity [13–16]. It has been speculated that oxygen concentration regulates the intricate balance between cellular proliferation and commitment towards differentiation, impacts 'stemness' of the MSCs [17]. Overall, it appears that the hypoxic environment is promoting a genetic program maintaining the undifferentiated and multipotent status of MSCs [12, 18].

Migration to the sites of injury is an essential and characteristic feature of MSC [6–8] which is mediated by several regulators such as the Rho family of GTPases. In particular, the RhoA signaling cascade is believed to play an essential role in migration of MSC [19]. It is one of the best characterized members of the Rho family and has been shown to control cytoskeletal activation in many adherent cells, including MSC. RhoA regulates microtubule and actin assembly, the formation of stress fibers and cell adhesion, regulation of contraction and retraction. Therefore, the RhoA signaling cascade is believed to play an essential role in migration of MSC.

In this paper, we compared the in vitro directional migration of human MSC (hMSC) permanently cultured under normal (21%) and low O2 (5%) conditions (from now on called 'normoxic' and 'hypoxic', respectively). Recent reports demonstrated the increased motility of hMSC grown under hypoxic conditions compared to normoxic cells [20]. However, the directional migration of hMSC cultured in hypoxia has not been investigated. A series of soluble chemokines, growth factors and inflammatory cytokines were chosen as chemoattractants in the in vitro transmembrane migration assay. We found that hMSCs cultured in hypoxia have higher motility compared to the normoxic hMSCs towards most of the studied factors, particularly towards wound healing cytokines and cytokines found in ischemic brain and infarcted myocardium milieu. In an attempt to understand the underlying reasons for increased migration of hypoxic hMSC we measured RhoA activation in the cells. We discovered a markedly enhanced activation of RhoA in hypoxic MSC suggesting that high hMSC migration may occur via increased sensitivity to RhoA activation.

Methods

Cell culture

The mononuclear MSC fraction was isolated from a human bone marrow purchased from Lonza (the marrow was obtained from a healthy volunteer with appropriate informed consent and under ethical approval according to Lonza (Walkersville, MD, USA). The cells were cultured in tissue culture dishes (TCDs) in hMSC growth medium (hMSCGM): (D)MEM/F12+Glutamax™-I basal medium (LifeTechnologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 15% bovine growth serum (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). For normoxic oxygen conditions (21% O2) cells were incubated in a standard humidified incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2. The hypoxia culturing was performed in a humidified 5% O2 and 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C.

Cell characterization

Marker Expression

Cells were stained with appropriate antibodies conjugated to R-Phycoerythrin (PE) (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and expression scored by flow cytometry using standard protocols. The antibodies used were CD14, CD19, CD34, CD45, CD 73, CD90, CD105, CD166, HLA-DR and isotype control, diluted according to the manufacturers' recommendations.

Differentiation

For adipocyte and osteocyte differentiation, cells were seeded at high density and allowed to grow to confluence. The media was removed and replaced with appropriate differentiation media (Life Technologies). They were cultured further for two weeks with intermittent media changes. Adipocytes were visibly recognized as lipid droplets in cells. Osteocyte cultures were stained with Alizarin Red [21]. Chondrocyte differentiation was accomplished as a micromass, tissues were embedded and sectioned in a cryostat. The sections were fixed, washed and stained with Alcian Blue [22].

Cytokine secretion

Passage 3 cells were seeded at 700 cells/cm2 and cultured for seven to nine days in either normoxia or hypoxia, with intermittent media change. When the cultures reached approximately 70% confluence, media was replaced and cultures further incubated for 24 hours. Media supernatants were harvested and stored at -20°C. Cells were harvested and counted. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) and angiopoietin-1 amounts in supernatants were determined by ELISA (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and normalized to amounts secreted by one million cells.

Colony Forming Unit - Fibroblasts (CFU-F)

Human bone marrow derived hMSCs were expanded under normal (normoxic) and 5% oxygen (hypoxic) conditions up to passage 2 and frozen in liquid nitrogen. A frozen stock of MSCs was thawed at 37°C, diluted with complete medium and recovered by centrifugation to remove dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The cells were suspended in medium and plated at 100 cells per 9 cm TCD for CFU assay according to the following design: 1) normoxic hMSCs assessed under normoxic conditions, 2) normoxic cells assessed in the hypoxic environment, and 3) hypoxic cells assessed under hypoxic conditions (total of three experimental groups, five dishes per group). The cultures were stained 14 days later with Giemsa and the number of colonies (CFU-F) was manually counted. The experiment was repeated three times.

Chemotaxis assay

A migration assay was performed in 48- or 96-well Corning Costar transwell chambers with porous polycarbonate membranes with a pore size of 5 um (Fisher Scientific, Rockville, MD, USA). hMSC at passage 4 were resuspended at 1 × 106/mL in the migration medium supplemented with 1% BSA and insulin transferrin selenium (ITS) and seeded in the upper chamber. The following human recombinant proteins were used as chemoattractants in the lower compartment: hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), platelet-derived growth factor-AB (PDGF-AB), epidermal growth factor (EGF), VEGF-121, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), macrophage inflammatory protein-3β (MIP-3β), macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α), B cell attracting chemokine-1 (BCA-1), regulation upon activation normal T cell express sequence (RANTES), growth regulated proteinα (GROα), fractalkine, SDF-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α (PeproTech). The concentration of each cytokine was optimized to ensure maximal cell migration through the porous membrane. The concentrations were: 40 ng/mL HGF, 10 ng/mL PDGF-AB, 10 ng/mL EGF, 10 ng/mL VEGF-121, 10 ng/mL bFGF, 30 ng/mL IGF-1, 10 ng/mL MIP-3β, 50 ng/mL MIP-1α, 5 ng/mL BCA-1, 150 ng/mL RANTES, 50 ng/mL GROα, 300 ng/mL Fractalkine, 150 ng/mL SDF-1α, 10 ng/mL IL-1β, 100 ng/mL IL-6, 50 ng/mL IL-8 and 50 ng/mL TNF-α. The chambers were incubated for four hours at 37°C in hypoxic or normoxic incubators. The cells from the top side of the membrane chamber were removed and the migrated cells on the underside of the membrane were completely dislodged by incubating the membrane inserts in 15 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for 20 minutes. All migratory cells were lysed with Triton X-100 and detected by CyQuant® GR dye (Life Technologies) according to a standard protocol (Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA, USA). Results were expressed as the mean number of net migrated cells over control cells (basal migration without chemotactic stimulus). Each condition was tested in four wells; each experiment was repeated four times.

RhoA activation assay

Passage 2 cells were seeded at 2,000 cells/cm2 and cultured for seven to nine days in either normoxic or hypoxic incubators, with intermittent media change. When the cultures reached approximately 70% confluence they were harvested and re-plated at the same concentration and cultured until reaching a confluence of 70% to 80%. For activation of RhoA, the growth media were changed to serum-free media containing either 100 ug/mL CN01 (calpeptin, Cytoskeleton, Denver, CO, USA) (activated MSC) or 1% DMSO (non-activated MSC), according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 10 minutes of incubation the cells were immediately put on ice and all consecutive manipulations were done on ice. To determine active RhoA (guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-bound) levels, a commercially available ELISA kit (G-LISA, Cytoskeleton) was utilized on the whole cell extracts according to the manufacturer's instructions. The results were normalized to the total protein level. Each experiment was repeated four times in 15 cm TCDs, two dishes per experimental group.

Hypoxia inducible factor -1 activity assay

Passage 2 cells were seeded at 2,000 cells/cm2 and cultured for seven to nine days in either normoxic or hypoxic incubators with intermittent media change. When the cultures reached approximately 70% confluence they were harvested and re-plated at the same concentration and cultured until reaching a confluence of 70% to 80%. After that time, cells were immediately put on ice and the nuclear extracts were collected according to the manufacturer's protocol (Nuclear Extract Kit, Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA). To determine activated hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) levels, a commercially available ELISA kit (Active Motif) was utilized on the nuclear extracts according to the manufacturer's instructions. The results were normalized to the number of cells. Each experiment was performed four times in 15 cm TCDs, three dishes per experimental group. The specificity of the assay was confirmed by using the wild-type consensus oligonucleotide which competes for HIF-1 binding and the mutated consensus oligonucleotide, which does not bind HIF-1.

Statistics

Data are representative of three or more independent experiments and presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's unpaired t-Tests (Microsoft Excel). Probability values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Cell characterization and differentiation, VEGF production

Both normoxia and hypoxia cultured hMSC stained positively for CD73, CD90 and CD105, a set of markers required to be expressed according to minimal criteria for defining multipotent MSC adopted by the International Society for Cell Therapy [23]. Also, both cells types did not express hematopoietic markers CD14 (monocytes/macrophages), CD19 (B cells), CD34 (progenitors/endothelial cells) or CD45 (leukocytes), or HLA-DR. Flow cytometry analysis revealed no difference in the expression of surface markers between hypoxic and normoxic hMSC. The fraction of HLA-DR-positive cells never exceeded 2%. Cell cultures grown in hypoxia and/or normoxia differentiated into adipocytes, osteocytes and chondrocytes and secreted a number of cytokines. hMSCs grown in hypoxia secreted greater amounts of some cytokines such as VEGF, SDF-1, and angiopoietin-1 (data not shown).

Colony Forming Unit - Fibroblasts

The effect of hypoxia on clonogenicity of hMSC was evaluated by the CFU-F assay. Hypoxic and normoxic hMSC were seeded in TCDs at a density of 1.66 cells/cm2 and incubated for 14 days. Initially, the assay was performed in the same oxygen environment as the original cell culture. The results showed dramatically higher CFU-F numbers (1.7 fold difference) produced by hypoxic hMSC (Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Clonogenicity of bone marrow derived hMSC determined in CFU-F assay. hMSCs grown and assayed under normal O2 (21%) - Normoxic MSC in normoxia, grown and assayed in low O2 (5%) - Hypoxic MSC in hypoxia, grown in normoxia and assayed in hypoxia - Normoxic MSC in hypoxia. The assay was performed in 9 cm tissue culture dishes, five dishes per experimental group. The cultures were terminated 14 days after initiation. The dishes were stained with Giemsa and the colonies (CFU-F) were manually counted. Each experiment was repeated three times. Columns represent the average number of colonies per plate from all three experiments combined (n = 15). The bars represent 1 SEM. × - P < 0.05, ×× - P < 0.0001. CFU-F, colony forming unit fibroblasts; hMSC, human mesenchymal stem cells; SEM, standard error of the mean.

It has been shown that MSC demonstrate higher CFU-F when placed in hypoxic conditions [13, 24, 25]. Therefore, to rule out the effect of the hypoxic assay environment, the normoxic cells were assessed for colony formation under hypoxic conditions. We observed a 20% increase in the number of colonies produced by normoxic hMSC in hypoxia compared to a normoxic environment. However, the number remained 50% (P = 4 × 10-6) lower than long term cultured hypoxic hMSC.

These data confirmed the notion that hMSC grown permanently in hypoxia have higher clonogenic potential compared to normoxic cells. It is unlikely that the observed phenomenon can be explained by hypoxic conditions during the assay. It may rather reflect the increased number of immature stem cells in the population of hypoxic hMSC.

Migration

Next, we studied the migration potential of hypoxic and normoxic hMSCs in vitro, using a transmembrane assay. Three groups of molecules were used as chemoattractants: growth factors (HGF, PDGF-AB, EGF, VEGF-121, bFGF, IGF-1), chemokines (MIP-3β, MIP-1α, BCA-1, RANTES, GROα, Fractalkine, SDF-1α), and inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α). The assay was performed in the same oxygen environment as the original cell culture.

Figure 2 (A, B, C) demonstrates that for the most part the number of migrating hypoxic hMSC was significantly higher compared to normoxic cells (HGF, EGF, VEGF-121, bFGF, BCA-1, RANTES, SDF-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, P < < 0.05), It should be noted that IL-8 was the only cytokine that showed some inhibitory effect on migration of hypoxic hMSC, although the difference did not reach significance between the oxygen groups (P = 0.87). Also, significance was not reached in the case of IGF-1 and MIP-3β (P = 0.21 and 0.25, respectively). However, all three cytokines (IL-8. IGF-1 and MIP-3β) stimulated a statistically significant increase in migration over the base line in both hypoxic and normoxic hMSC.

Figure 2
figure 2

Migration capacity of hypoxic and normoxic hMSCs towards growth factors, chemokines and inflammatory cytokines. In vitro migration was assayed in transwell plates with porous polycarbonate membranes (pore size: 5 um). Columns represent the difference between the mean numbers of induced and spontaneously migrating cells (no chemoattractant added). Each condition was tested in four wells; each experiment was repeated four times. The bars represent 1 SEM from four independent experiments combined (n = 16). × - P > 0.05, ×× - P < 0.05. (A): Migration of (BM) hMSC towards growth factors, (B): Migration of (BM) hMSC towards chemokines, (C): Migration of (BM) hMSC towards inflammatory cytokines. hMSC, human mesenchymal stem cells; SEM, standard error of the mean.

It is interesting to observe that the migration towards the growth factors was more prominent compared to inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. On average, 280% more cells migrated towards HGF, PDGF-AB and EGF than towards inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. SDF-1α demonstrated the highest chemotactic activity among them, being as stimulating for cell migration as the most active growth factors.

To rule out the effect of the assay environment on migration of hMSC, the normoxic cells were transferred for the assay into hypoxia. Although we observed more migrating cells in normoxic hMSC under hypoxic conditions compared to normoxia, the numbers remained significantly lower (P < 0.05) than in long term cultured hypoxic hMSC for most of the cytokines tested except for PDGF-AB, MIP-1α, BCA-1 and GROα (P > 0.05, data not shown).

In addition, we found that the increased migration of hypoxic cells was particularly noticeable toward cytokines involved in the wound healing process such as EGF, bFGF, VEGF-121, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α (Figure 2). All of them have been shown to participate in a complex signaling network leading to wound repair and regeneration [26].

Taken together, our data suggest that the in vitro migration of hMSCs permanently grown in hypoxia is significantly higher compared to hMSC grown under normoxic conditions.

Evaluation of mechanisms involved in the enhanced hypoxic hMSC migration

Role of RhoA in hMSC migration

First, we explored the involvement of RhoA in the observed phenomena. As has been already mentioned in the Introduction, the RhoA signaling cascade is believed to play an essential role in the migration of MSC [19]. It controls cytoskeletal activation in many cell types including MSC [27, 28]. To become functional RhoA needs to be activated by a variety of growth factors, cytokines, adhesion molecules, hormones, integrins, G-proteins and other biologically active substances [29]. In vitro it can be activated by synthetic molecules, such as CN01 (calpeptin), which was used in this study. We measured the concentration of GTP-bound (active) RhoA in the whole cell extracts of activated hypoxic and normoxic hMSC. The activation of the hMSC for the assay was performed in the same oxygen environment as the original cell culture.

The results showed that upon activation of hMSC with CN01 the level of GTP-bound RhoA in hypoxic cells is significantly higher (1.7-fold increase) than in normoxic cells (Figure 3). It is noteworthy that the level of GTP-bound RhoA in non-activated hMSC was not different between the groups (P = 0.66), suggesting that long term cultivation in hypoxia enhances activation of RhoA in hMSC.

Figure 3
figure 3

RhoA activation by calpeptin measured by G-LISA in hypoxic and normoxic hMSCs. The activation was performed in the same oxygen environment as the original cell culture. Cells were 80% to 90% confluent when treated with 0.1 mg/mL of calpeptin for 10 minutes, then lysed and the lysates were subjected to the G-LISA assay (activated MSC). The control cells were treated with the media, which did not contain calpeptin (non-activated MSC). The assay was performed in two dishes per experimental group; each experiment was repeated four times. Data are presented with the subtracted background (medium alone). Columns represent the average of four experiments combined (n = 8). The bars represent 1 SEM. × - P < 0.05, ×× - P < 0.01. MSC, mesenchymal stem cells; SEM, standard error of the mean.

Overall, these data, together with the observed increased migration of hypoxic hMSC, support the involvement of RhoA in hMSC migration. Moreover, we speculate that hypoxia may lead to greater hMSCs migration via increased sensitivity to RhoA activation.

Active HIF-1 and RhoA activation in hypoxic hMSC

To study how hypoxia may lead to enhanced RhoA activation we assayed the activity of HIF-1 in hypoxic and normoxic hMSCs. It has been established that hypoxia-activated HIF-1 is a major contributor to cell transcription alteration [30]. Activated HIF-1 was shown to be a potential upstream regulator of RhoA activation in MSC [19, 31].

In this study, we measured HIF-1 activity in hypoxic and normoxic cells using the TransAM method (Activ Motif). This approach allows detecting only activated HIF-1 in cell nuclear extracts. The specificity of the assay was confirmed by adding either the wild-type or mutated consensus oligonucleotides to the tested samples. The addition of the wild-type nucleotide to the tested samples completely suppressed HIF-1 binding to the probe immobilized on the assay plate. Conversely, the addition of the mutated oligonucleotide did not affect the assay results, thus confirming the specificity of the testing method.

We found that normoxic hMSCs demonstrate very low (undetectable) levels of active HIF-1, unlike hypoxic cells which have accumulated large amounts of this factor (8.4 ng per 1 million cells) (Figure 4). The data suggest that hypoxia-activated HIF-1 may be involved in enhanced activation of RhoA in hypoxic hMSC. Thus, it can be speculated that high activity of HIF-1 in hypoxic hMSC leads to increased cell motility via the stimulated activation of RhoA.

Figure 4
figure 4

Activated HIF-1 measured by TransAM HIF-1 ELISA in hypoxic and normoxic hMSCs. Columns represent mean amounts of activated HIF-1 normalized to amounts per million harvested cells. The assay was performed in three dishes per experimental group; each experiment was repeated four times. Data are presented with the subtracted background (medium alone). Columns represent the average of four experiments combined (n = 12). The bars represent 1 SEM. ×- P < < 0.01. ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HIF-1, hypoxia inducible factor-1; hMSCs, human mesenchymal stem cells; SEM, standard error of the mean.

Discussion

In this paper, we provide the evidence for higher in vitro targeted migration of hMSC cultured under hypoxic conditions compared to the cells grown in normal oxygen toward most of the tested cytokines. Previous studies showed the enhancing effect of short term exposure to hypoxia on migration of MSC [15, 19, 28, 32–34]; an increase in cell velocity and Euclidian distance on a series of matrices for the hMSC cultured in 2% hypoxia has also been shown [20]. To our knowledge we are the first to report higher targeted migration of hMSC grown in hypoxia for the entire culturing period.

We tested migration toward the factors from three major groups - growth factors, chemokines and inflammatory cytokines - since hMSCs have been shown to express an array of functional receptors for those molecules [35–38]. We found that all 17 cytokines tested in this study mediated in vitro cell migration of hMSC, with the least activity among chemokines and the most among growth factors, which is in agreement with other studies [35–37].

In addition, we noticed that hypoxic cells are more responsive to cytokines often present in a wound milieu (Figure 2). The most important among them are the EGF family, the fibroblast growth factor family, VEGF-121, PDGF-AB, the IL family and TNF-α [26]. The enhanced migration of hMSCs toward the wound healing cytokines can potentially accelerate the formation of new tissue and ultimately wound closure.

In addition, we found a significantly better migration of hypoxic cells toward such factors as HGF, SDF-1α, the IL family cytokines and TNF-α. It is tempting to speculate that this feature may lead to better in vivo homing of long term hypoxia-cultured hMSCs to the sites of infarct and stroke since those factors are abundant at the sites of ischemic injury [39–43].

It is noteworthy that migration of normoxic hMSC transferred for the assay into a hypoxic environment was still lower than in hypoxic cells, but higher than in normoxic cells assessed in normoxia (data not shown) confirming the known stimulating effect of acute hypoxia on the migration of MSC. It has been shown that hypoxic pre-conditioning increases MSC migration [32] due, at least in part, to up-regulated expression of the chemokine receptors CX3CR1 and CXCR4 [15], as well as the c-Met receptor for HGF [33]. It is possible that the increased migration of cells permanently cultured in hypoxia can be explained by up-regulation of a series of receptors. However, we believe that the major reason for the mentioned phenomenon is the undifferentiated status of hypoxic MSC.

The latter notion is supported by the analysis of CFU-F efficiency, which demonstrated that hypoxic hMSC have increased CFU-F, compared to similar cells grown under normoxic conditions (Figure 1). Normoxic cells assayed for CFU-F in hypoxia still produced a significantly lower number of colonies compared to hypoxic cells ruling out the effect of assay environment. Rather, the higher number of CFU-F in hypoxic cells may be due to the accumulation of immature stem cell progenitors as previously proposed [12].

Perhaps the most significant finding of this study is the enhanced activation of RhoA in hypoxic hMSC. The RhoA signaling cascade is believed to play an essential role in the migration of MSC [19]. The family of RhoGTPases directs a variety of cell responses including cell migration, adhesion, transcription, growth and so on [44]. It controls cytoskeletal activation in many cell types including MSC [27, 28]. We demonstrated that upon activation with CN01 the increase of GTP-bound RhoA over non-activated cells is considerably higher in hypoxic hMSC compared to normoxic cells (3-fold and 1.5-fold, respectively). It remains to be investigated whether this phenomenon is true for other types of stem cells reflecting their undifferentiated status. The precise mechanism of the observed difference in sensitivity is unclear. Recently, it has been shown that HIF-1 and RhoA cross-talk suggesting the role of HIF-1 in hypoxic regulation of MSC migration through the RhoA signaling cascade [19, 31].

HIF-1 is one of the key regulators of oxygen homeostasis [45]. HIF-1 is a heterodimeric protein that consists of two subunits, HIF-1α and HIF-1β. While HIF-1β is constitutively expressed, the expression of HIF-1α is lower in normoxic conditions (O2 > 6%) due to its hydroxylation and degradation. In hypoxia (O2 < 6%) both subunits, HIF-1α and β, survive degradation and form an active HIF-1 heterodimer, which binds to the HRE in the cell nucleus [46]. It has been shown that artificial stabilization of HIF-1 in normoxia by desferrioxamine (DFO), as well as pre-conditioning in 1% hypoxia result in attenuation of RhoA activation [19, 31] suggesting that activated HIF-1 is a potential upstream regulator of RhoA. We found that both activated HIF-1 and GTP-bound RhoA were elevated in long term hypoxic cells, reflecting a strong link between HIF-1 and activation of RhoA in hypoxic hMSC.

It should be noted that the RhoA activation pattern observed by Raheja et al. [19] for hMSC pre-conditioned in 1% hypoxia or treated with DFO (state close to anoxia) is different compared to the data presented in this paper. It can be due to the fact that hypoxia pre-conditioning, which reflects the acute cellular response to hypoxia [33] rather than cell differentiation status, is substantively different from permanent cell cultivation in the low O2 environment. Also, 0%/1% and 5% oxygen concentrations may potentially have different effects on MSCs physiology [18]. Therefore, we believe it is difficult to directly compare our data to the results reported by Raheja et al. [19].

Conclusions

In conclusion, in this paper we confirmed the notion that hMSC cultured under hypoxic conditions preserve their undifferentiated status as judged by higher colony-forming potential and increased in vitro targeted migration. In addition, for the first time, we demonstrated that hypoxic MSC compared to normoxic are dramatically more sensitive to activation of RhoA which may contribute to the observed high migration. Finally, we found that hypoxic hMSCs migrate better towards wound healing cytokines and cytokines found in an ischemic tissue milieu suggesting their potential therapeutic advantages over normoxic cells.

Abbreviations

BCA-1:

B cell attracting chemokine-1

bFGF:

basic fibroblast growth factor

BSA:

bovine serum albumin

CFU-F:

colony forming unit fibroblasts

DFO:

desferrioxamine

(D)MEM:

(Dulbecco's) modified Eagle's medium

DMSO:

dimethyl sulfoxide

EGF:

epidermal growth factor

ELISA:

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

GROα:

growth regulated protein α

GTP:

guanosine triphosphate

HGF:

hepatocyte growth factor

HIF-1:

hypoxia inducible factor-1

hMSC:

human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells

hMSCGM:

hMSC growth medium

HRE:

hypoxia response element

IGF-1:

insulin-like growth factor

IL-1β:

interleukin-1β

IL-6:

interleukin-6

IL-8:

interleukin-8

ITS:

insulin transferrin selenium

MIP-1α:

macrophage inflammatory protein-1α

MIP-3β:

macrophage inflammatory protein-3β

PDGF-AB:

platelet-derived growth factor-AB

RANTES:

regulation upon activation normal T cell express sequence

SDF-1α:

stromal cell-derived factor-1α

TCD:

tissue culture dishes

TNF-α:

tumor necrosis factor- α

VEGF-121:

vascular endothelial growth factor-121.

References

  1. Sarugaser R, Hanoun L, Keating A, Stanford WL, Davies JE: Human mesenchymal stem cells self-renew and differentiate according to a deterministic hierarchy. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e6498-10.1371/journal.pone.0006498.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schinkothe T, Bloch W, Schmidt A: In vitro secreting profile of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2008, 17: 199-206. 10.1089/scd.2007.0175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Terada N, Hamazaki T, Oka M, Hoki M, Mastalerz DM, Nakano Y, Meyer EM, Morel L, Petersen BE, Scott EW: Bone marrow cells adopt the phenotype of other cells by spontaneous cell fusion. Nature. 2002, 416: 542-545. 10.1038/nature730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vassilopoulos G, Wang PR, Russell DW: Transplanted bone marrow regenerates liver by cell fusion. Nature. 2003, 422: 901-904. 10.1038/nature01539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang X, Willenbring H, Akkari Y, Torimaru Y, Foster M, Al-Dhalimy M, Lagasse E, Finegold M, Olson S, Grompe M: Cell fusion is the principal source of bone-marrow-derived hepatocytes. Nature. 2003, 422: 897-901. 10.1038/nature01531.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson JS, Golding JP, Chapon C, Jones WA, Bhakoo KK: Homing of stem cells to sites of inflammatory brain injury after intracerebral and intravenous administration: a longitudinal imaging study. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2010, 1: 17-10.1186/scrt17.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ji JF, He BP, Dheen ST, Tay SS: Interactions of chemokines and chemokine receptors mediate the migration of mesenchymal stem cells to the impaired site in the brain after hypoglossal nerve injury. Stem Cells. 2004, 22: 415-427. 10.1634/stemcells.22-3-415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Humphreys BD, Bonventre JV: Mesenchymal stem cells in acute kidney injury. Annu Rev Med. 2008, 59: 311-325. 10.1146/annurev.med.59.061506.154239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chow D, Wenning L, Miller W, Papoutsakis E: Modeling pO2 distributions in the bone marrow hematopoietic compartment. II. Modified Kroghian models. Biophys J. 2001, 81: 685-696. 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75733-5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishikawa Y, Ito T: Kinetics of hemopoietic stem cells in a hypoxic culture. Eur J Haematol. 1988, 40: 126-129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pennathur-Das R, Levitt L: Augmentation of in vitro human marrow erythropoiesis under physiological oxygen tensions is mediated by monocytes and T lymphocytes. Blood. 1987, 69: 899-907.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Basciano L, Nemos C, Foliguet B, de Isla N, de Carvalho M, Tran N, Dalloul A: Long term culture of mesenchymal stem cells in hypoxia promotes a genetic program maintaining their undifferentiated and multipotent status. BMC Cell Biol. 2011, 12: 1-12. 10.1186/1471-2121-12-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grayson WL, Zhao F, Izadpanah R, Bunnell B, Ma T: Effects of hypoxia on human mesenchymal stem cell expansion and plasticity in 3D constructs. J Cell Physiol. 2006, 207: 331-339. 10.1002/jcp.20571.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Potier E, Ferreira E, Andriamanalijaona R, Pujol JP, Oudina K, Logeart-Avramoglou D, Petite H: Hypoxia affects mesenchymal stromal cell osteogenic differentiation and angiogenic factor expression. Bone. 2007, 40: 1078-1087. 10.1016/j.bone.2006.11.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hung S, Pochampally R, Hsu S, Sanchez C, Chen S, Spees J, Prockop D: Short-term exposure of multipotent stromal cells to low oxygen increases their expression of CX3CR1 and CXCR4 and their engraftment in vivo. PLoS One. 2007, 2: e416-10.1371/journal.pone.0000416.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grayson WL, Zhao F, Bunnell B, Ma T: Hypoxia enhances proliferation and tissue formation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 358: 948-953. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.05.054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ren H, Cao Y, Zhao Q, Li J, Zhou C, Liao L, Jia M, Cai H, Han ZC, Yang R, Chen G, Zhao RC: Proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells under hypoxic conditions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 347: 12-21. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.05.169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin Q, Kim Y, Alarcon RM, Yun Z: Oxygen and cell fate decisions. Gene Regul Syst Biol. 2008, 2: 43-51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Raheja LF, Genetos DC, Wong A, Yellowley CE: Hypoxic regulation of mesenchymal stem cell migration: the role of RhoA and HIF-1a. Cell Biol Int. 2011, 35: 981-989. 10.1042/CBI20100733.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saller MM, Prall WC, Docheva D, Schonitzer V, Popov T, Anz D, Clausen-Schaumann H, Mutschler W, Volkmer E, Schieker M, Polzer H: Increased stemness and migration of human mesenchymal stem cells in hypoxia is associated with altered integrin expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012, 423: 379-385. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.05.134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bodine PV, Trailsmith M, Komm BS: Development and characterization of a conditionally transformed adult human osteoblastic cell line. J Bone Miner Res. 1996, 11: 806-819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Belflower RM, Dong YF, Schwarz EM, O'Keefe RJ, Drissi H: Runx1/AML1/Cbfa2 mediates onset of mesenchymal cell differentiation toward chondrogenesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2005, 20: 1624-1636. 10.1359/JBMR.050516.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prockop D, Horwitz E: Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006, 8: 315-317. 10.1080/14653240600855905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dos Santos F, Andrade PZ, Boura JS, Abecasis MM, da Silva CL, Cabral JM: Ex vivo expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells: a more effective cell proliferation kinetics and metabolism under hypoxia. J Cell Physiol. 2010, 223: 27-35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Q, Yang S, Yang C: [In vitro hypoxic culture of human marrow mesenchymal stem cells and their biological features in adults]. Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za. 2007, 21: 1128-1132. [Article in Chinese]

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H, Tomic-Canic M: Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2008, 16: 585-601. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee MJ, Jeon ES, Lee JS, Cho M, Suh DS, Chang CL, Kim JH: Lysophosphatidic acid in malignant ascites stimulates migration of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Biochem. 2008, 104: 499-510. 10.1002/jcb.21641.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jaganathan BG, Ruester B, Dressel L, Stein S, Grez M, Seifried E, Henschler R: Rho inhibition induces migration of mesenchymal stromal cells. Stem Cells. 2007, 25: 1966-1974. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Loirand G, Guilluy C, Pacaud P: Regulation of Rho proteins by phosphorylation in the cardiovascular system. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2006, 16: 199-204. 10.1016/j.tcm.2006.03.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith TG, Robbins PA, Ratcliffe PJ: The human side of hypoxia-inducible factor. Br J Haematol. 2008, 141: 325-334. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07029.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pacary E, Tixier E, Coulet F, Roussel S, Petit E, Bernaudin M: Crosstalk between HIF-1 and ROCK pathways in neuronal differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, neurospheres and in PC12 neurite outgrowth. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2007, 35: 409-423. 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.04.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu X, Wei L, Taylor TM, Wei J, Zhou X, Wang JA, Yu SP: Hypoxic preconditioning enhances bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell migration via Kv2.1 channel and FAK activation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011, 301: C362-372. 10.1152/ajpcell.00013.2010.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosova I, Dao M, Capoccia B, Link D, Nolta JA: Hypoxic preconditioning results in increased motility and improved therapeutic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2008, 26: 2173-2182. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-1104.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Annabi B, Lee YT, Turcotte S, Naud E, Desrosiers RR, Champagne M, Eliopoulos N, Galipeau J, Beliveau R: Hypoxia promotes murine bone-marrow-derived stromal cell migration and tube formation. Stem Cells. 2003, 21: 337-347. 10.1634/stemcells.21-3-337.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chamberlain G, Wright K, Rot A, Ashton B, Middleton J: Murine mesenchymal stem cells exhibit a restricted repertoire of functional chemokine receptors: comparison with human. PLoS One. 2008, 3: 1-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chamberlain G, Fox J, Ashton B, Middleton J: Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: their phenotype, differentiation capacity, immunological features, and potential for homing. Stem Cells. 2007, 25: 2739-2749. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ponte AL, Marais E, Gallay N, Langonne A, Delorme B, Herault O, Charbord P, Domenech J: The in vitro migration capacity of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: comparison of chemokine and growth factor chemotactic activities. Stem Cells. 2007, 25: 1737-1745. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Honczarenko M, Le Y, Swierkowski M, Ghiran I, Glodek AM, Silberstein LE: Human bone marrow stromal cells express a distinct set of biologically functional chemokine receptors. Stem Cells. 2006, 24: 1030-1041. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lambertsen KL, Biber K, Finsen B: Inflammatory cytokines in experimental and human stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012, 32: 1677-1698. 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.88.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vogel S, Trapp T, Borger V, Peters C, Lakbir D, Dilloo D, Sorg RV: Hepatocyte growth factor-mediated attraction of mesenchymal stem cells for apoptotic neuronal and cardiomyocytic cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010, 67: 295-303. 10.1007/s00018-009-0183-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Abarbanell AM, Coffey AC, Fehrenbacher JW, Beckman DJ, Herrmann JL, Weil B, Meldrum DR: Proinflammatory cytokine effects on mesenchymal stem cell therapy for the ischemic heart. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009, 88: 1036-1043. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nian M, Lee P, Khaper N, Liu P: Inflammatory cytokines and postmyocardial infarction remodeling. Circ Res. 2004, 94: 1543-1553. 10.1161/01.RES.0000130526.20854.fa.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. De Simoni MG, Milia P, Barba M, De Luigi A, Parnetti L, Gallai V: The inflammatory response in cerebral ischemia: focus on cytokines in stroke patients. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2002, 24: 535-542. 10.1081/CEH-120015330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mizutani T, Kawabata K, Koyama Y, Takahashi M, Haga H: Regulation of cellular contractile force in response to mechanical stretch by diphosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain via RhoA signaling cascade. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2009, 66: 389-397. 10.1002/cm.20378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Richard DE, Berra E, Gothie E, Roux D, Pouyssegur J: p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinases phosphorylate hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha) and enhance the transcriptional activity of HIF-1. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 32631-32637. 10.1074/jbc.274.46.32631.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jiang BH, Semenza GL, Bauer C, Marti HH: Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 levels vary exponentially over a physiologically relevant range of O2 tension. Am J Physiol. 1996, 271: C1172-1180.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Sheena Cadua for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Grigory Vertelov or Alex Kharazi.

Additional information

Competing interests

GV, LK, MGM and AK are employees of 'Stemedica' Cell Technologies. GS and TT are uncompensated interns.

Authors' contributions

GV, LK, MGK, GS and TT performed experiments, assembled and collected the data. MGM and LK cultured the cells and performed the CFU-F assay. GV, GS and TT carried out the transmembrane migration assays. GV and GS performed the ELISA analyses. GV and AK contributed to the conception and design of the study, interpretation of the results and manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vertelov, G., Kharazi, L., Muralidhar, M.G. et al. High targeted migration of human mesenchymal stem cells grown in hypoxia is associated with enhanced activation of RhoA. Stem Cell Res Ther 4, 5 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/scrt153

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/scrt153

Keywords